Sunday, April 20, 2025

πŸͺ“ The Grafted Branch That Bears Alien Fruit: Islam’s Failed Claim to Biblical Continuity

Islam claims to be the final revelation of the same God worshiped by Jews and Christians, positioning itself as a continuation of biblical faith. Yet, while Islam grafts itself onto the roots of Judaism and Christianity, it produces contradictory doctrines that undermine the very foundations of those faiths. This exposes a profound theological disconnect—revealing that Islam is not a branch of the same tree, but a foreign graft that bears alien fruit.


🌳 Part 1: The Tree of Monotheism — Rooted in Judaism and Christianity

Judaism and Christianity form the trunk and root system of the Western monotheistic worldview. Both traditions are historically, theologically, and literarily linked. Though Christianity diverges from Judaism by affirming that the Messiah has already come in the person of Jesus Christ, it does so as a fulfillment—not a rejection—of Jewish expectation.

Key Doctrinal Foundations Shared by the Tree:

  • Divine Covenant with Israel (Judaism): Through Abraham and Moses, God made a binding covenant, revealed His law, and promised redemption through a future Messiah.

  • Fulfillment in Christ (Christianity): Jesus of Nazareth, believed by Christians to be the divine Son of God, fulfilled the law and prophets (Matthew 5:17) through His death and resurrection.

  • Historical Continuity: Christianity affirms the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) as divinely inspired scripture and roots its identity in that Jewish heritage.

Bottom line: Christianity does not replace Judaism—it extends it. It grafts onto it naturally, sharing the same root system and fulfilling its promises.


🌿 Part 2: Islam as the Grafted Branch — Claiming the Same Roots

The Qur’an presents Islam as a religion in continuity with the Judeo-Christian tradition. It claims that:

  • Allah revealed the Torah to Moses (Surah 5:44),

  • The Psalms to David (Surah 4:163),

  • And the Gospel to Jesus (Surah 5:46).

Muhammad is described as the final prophet (khatam al-nabiyyin), bringing the last and purest revelation to correct what was lost or corrupted in previous scriptures (Surah 2:79, Surah 3:3, Surah 5:48). Islam claims its theology is a return to the unadulterated monotheism of Abraham.

But herein lies the paradox:

Islam simultaneously:

  1. Claims to confirm previous scriptures, and

  2. Denies their central theological teachings.

This is the theological equivalent of grafting a cactus onto an olive tree—biologically incompatible, the result is not a hybrid, but a contradiction.


🍎 Part 3: The Alien Fruit — Core Contradictions Between Islam and the Bible

Despite its grafted position, the “fruit” Islam produces is fundamentally foreign to both Jewish and Christian belief.

🚫 1. The Nature of God: Monotheism vs. Trinitarianism

  • Judaism and Christianity: God is personal, covenantal, and—especially in Christianity—relational. Christianity introduces the Trinity: one God in three co-eternal persons.

  • Islam: Allah is singular, indivisible, and utterly transcendent. The Trinity is rejected as shirk (idolatry) (Surah 4:171, 5:73).

πŸ‘‰ Conclusion: Islam’s deity is not the same God worshiped by Christians, and not consistent with the God of Israel who covenanted with His people and later incarnated as Christ.


🚫 2. Jesus Christ: Divine Savior vs. Mortal Prophet

  • Christianity: Jesus is God in the flesh, crucified and resurrected for humanity’s redemption.

  • Islam: Jesus (Isa) is a prophet, not divine, not crucified, and not resurrected (Surah 4:157).

πŸ‘‰ Contradiction: Islam doesn't reinterpret Jesus; it denies His core identity. This is not theological refinement—it’s historical revisionism.


🚫 3. The Cross and Atonement: Redemption vs. Deception

  • Christianity: The crucifixion is the central redemptive event of history (1 Corinthians 15:3–4).

  • Islam: Jesus was not crucified; it only appeared so (Surah 4:157). Some traditions claim someone else was made to look like Jesus and was crucified in His place.

πŸ‘‰ Implication: Islam nullifies the core of the Christian message—atonement through Christ's death—while basing its own legitimacy on a text that repeatedly calls Jesus “Messiah” but empties that title of all biblical content.


🚫 4. God’s Relationship to Humanity: Grace vs. Submission

  • Christianity: God invites intimate relationship—“Abba, Father.” Salvation is a gift of grace (Ephesians 2:8–9).

  • Islam: The highest virtue is submission (Islam), and God is not described in relational terms. Allah is unknowable and utterly other.

πŸ‘‰ Theological Distance: Christianity’s God is immanent and loving. Islam’s Allah is distant and master-like. These are not two flavors of the same God. They are metaphysically distinct conceptions.


πŸ” Part 4: Islam’s Retrospective Rewriting — Claiming Lineage While Changing the DNA

Islam uses biblical characters but rewrites their stories:

  • Abraham becomes a proto-Muslim who builds the Kaaba.

  • Moses becomes a sharia enforcer.

  • Jesus becomes a prophet warning about Muhammad.

This isn’t theological continuity. It’s doctrinal appropriation:

  • Names remain, but

  • Meaning is erased.

Islam assumes the authority of the biblical lineage while systematically dismantling the theology that made those figures significant.


πŸ”₯ Part 5: The Tension Exposed — Not the Same Tree, Not the Same Fruit

By all appearances, Islam is part of the Abrahamic tradition. It uses the same vocabulary—God, prophet, scripture, Messiah, Gospel—but it redefines each term.

  • It affirms the Torah, but denies its legal and covenantal structure.

  • It affirms the Gospel, but denies its central event: the cross.

  • It affirms Jesus, but rejects everything that makes Him the Christ.

The Result:

“The grafted branch does not bear the tree’s fruit. It bears incompatible fruit—foreign to the root, alien to the tree, and unrecognizable to the orchard it claims to complete.”


🧬 Final Verdict: A Graft That Fails the DNA Test

To accept Islam’s claims of continuity with Judaism and Christianity is to deny the internal logic of both. If Jesus is the Son of God, as Christianity affirms, then Islam’s denial is blasphemy. If Jesus is only a prophet, as Islam claims, then Christianity is idolatry. Both cannot be true. The theological systems are mutually exclusive.

⚖️ The Law of Non-Contradiction Applies:

A branch cannot be both part of the tree and bear fruit that contradicts the tree’s nature.

Islam is not the continuation of biblical revelation. It is a theological counter-narrative, claiming lineage while rewriting the family history. The “grafted branch” metaphor collapses when tested by doctrine, history, and logic.


πŸ“Œ Conclusion: Different Roots, Different Tree, Different God

Islam's claim to be the final revelation in the Abrahamic tradition is invalidated by its rejection of that tradition’s essential teachings. Its doctrine is incompatible with the roots it tries to graft onto.

  • It denies the covenant of Israel.

  • It rewrites the Gospel.

  • It redefines God.

Therefore, Islam is not the grafted branch of Judaism and Christianity. It is an entirely different tree pretending to grow from the same soil. The contradiction is not cosmetic—it is foundational.

No comments:

Post a Comment

  What Did Muhammad's Islam Look Like Without Hadiths, Sharia, or Later Developments? If we strip away the Hadiths, Sharia law, tafsir (...