The Term “Injil”: A Projection of the Qur’an’s Own Book-Centric Theology
📖 Qur’anic Claim:
“And We sent, following in their footsteps, Jesus, the son of Mary, confirming that which came before him in the Torah; and We gave him the Injil...”
— Qur’an 5:46
The Qur’an repeatedly claims that Jesus was given a divine book called the Injil, akin to how Moses received the Torah and Muhammad the Qur’an. It treats the Injil as a singular, revealed scripture, directly granted to Jesus during his ministry.
🏛️ Historical Problem:
This depiction is historically untenable for several reasons:
-
No Single Book Called “Injil” Existed in Jesus’ Time:
There is no historical or textual evidence that Jesus received a codified scripture from heaven. Unlike Muhammad’s Qur’an, which Muslims believe was revealed verbatim, Jesus taught orally, using parables and Jewish scriptures. He left no written work of his own. -
The Gospels Came Later:
The four canonical Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John) were written between 60–100 CE, decades after Jesus' death, and by different authors—not by Jesus himself. They are biographical narratives, not direct revelations.
The term “Gospel” (euangelion) in Greek means “good news”, referring to the message about Jesus, not a text given to him. -
No Evidence of a Book Called “Injil”:
The term “Injil” is the Arabicized form of the Greek “evangelion”, but there is no historical Christian document or sect in antiquity that referred to Jesus having a book named Injil. It is a retrojected term, applying Qur’anic assumptions to earlier religious history.
🧩 Source of Confusion:
The Qur’an appears to project its own literary model of revelation—in which prophets are given tangible books—onto previous figures like Jesus and Moses. This results in the anachronistic assumption that Jesus had a scripture like the Qur’an.
But Christian scripture formation was completely different:
-
Jesus taught orally, often referencing the Hebrew Bible.
-
His followers wrote about him, not under dictation, but as theological reflections.
-
The New Testament canon was formalized centuries later, not during his lifetime.
🕌 Islamic Explanation:
Muslim apologists argue that the original Injil was lost or corrupted, and that the Gospels are distorted remnants. However, this defense:
-
Assumes the existence of a “true Injil” without textual or archaeological evidence.
-
Implies a massive, undocumented conspiracy that successfully erased the true gospel across all sects and centuries.
-
Still does not solve the problem that Jesus never claimed to receive a book.
Thus, Islam’s explanation simply pushes the problem further back without resolving the historical disconnect.
🔍 Canonical vs. Apocryphal Texts:
Some Islamic traditions seem to have absorbed content from non-canonical (apocryphal) Christian writings (e.g., Infancy Gospel of Thomas, Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew)—which were also not given to Jesus, but written even later than the canonical Gospels. This reinforces the point that the Qur’an reflects a 7th-century Arabian misunderstanding of Christian scripture.
📚 Key Timeline:
-
c. 30 CE: Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection (per historical and Christian sources).
-
c. 60–100 CE: Canonical Gospels written.
-
2nd–4th centuries CE: Christian canon formalized; apocryphal gospels circulated.
-
7th century CE: Qur’an refers to a book called “Injil” given directly to Jesus.
The term “Injil” in the Qur'an therefore does not correspond to any historical reality in Christian tradition.
⚖️ Theological Implication:
If the Qur’an was authored by an all-knowing deity, it would not retroject its own book-revelation model onto Jesus—a figure who never received nor claimed any such scripture. This points not to divine insight, but to a projection of Muhammad’s experience onto past figures, possibly to validate his own prophetic model.
🔚 Conclusion: A Book That Never Existed
The “Injil” as described in the Qur’an is a literary invention, based on a fundamentally flawed understanding of Christian origins. It has no historical foundation, contradicts both Jewish and Christian records, and reflects 7th-century theological projection, not divine continuity.
No comments:
Post a Comment