Wednesday, April 23, 2025

✝️ Why Islam Needed to Hijack Jesus — and Not the Gap

Filling 600 Years of Silence with a Borrowed Prophet


🧭 Introduction: The Gap No One Can Fill

Islam claims to be:

  • The final link in a chain of divine revelation,

  • The continuation of earlier monotheistic faiths,

  • The restoration of the original Abrahamic message.

But there’s one problem:

Between Jesus and Muhammadnothing.

  • No prophets.

  • No scriptures.

  • No revelation.

  • No names.

  • No trace.

Just 600 years of silence from the same God who supposedly sends prophets to every nation.

So what did Islam do?

It hijacked Jesus.

Instead of explaining the gap — it rewrote Jesus into a proto-Muslim to force theological continuity.

And it fails miserably.


📜 The Qur’an’s Jesus — A Theological Rewrite

The Islamic Isa:

  • Was born of a virgin (but without being divine),

  • Preached Tawhid (pure monotheism),

  • Performed miracles (but wasn’t the Son of God),

  • Was given the Injil (a now-lost mystery book),

  • Was not crucified,

  • Was lifted to heaven,

  • And will return to destroy crosses and enforce Islam.

That’s not continuity. That’s character theft.

Islam didn’t inherit Jesus — it rewrote him.


🧠 Why Islam Had to Hijack Jesus

Let’s break it down:

🔹 Premise 1:

Islam claims to be part of a divine chain of prophets and scriptures.

🔹 Premise 2:

There is a 600-year gap between Jesus and Muhammad with no prophets.

🔹 Premise 3:

Rather than explain the gap, Islam:

  • Claims Jesus was a Muslim,

  • Rejects the historical Jesus,

  • Denies the crucifixion,

  • Invents a missing Injil.

✅ Conclusion:

Islam fabricated a revised Jesus to retroactively plug the gap — and create the illusion of continuity.

It didn’t answer the silence — it rewrote the last prophet to delay it.


🛑 What This Reveals

  • The real Jesus had a public ministry, public miracles, public crucifixion, public followers.

  • The Islamic Jesus (Isa) is an invisible construct with:

    • No public ministry in 7th-century records,

    • No evidence of a lost Injil,

    • No followers preaching “Islam” in his name.

So why claim him?

Because Islam couldn’t defend the gap…
So it borrowed Jesus to make it look like the light never went out.


🤯 The Logic Implodes

Islam says:

Jesus was a prophet of Islam, sent with the Injil.

But:

  • There is no historical record of a Muslim-style Jesus.

  • The Gospels contradict the Qur’an on nearly every point.

  • Christians worshiped a crucified and risen Jesus centuries before Muhammad.

So what does Islam do?
❌ It doesn’t acknowledge the contradiction.
✅ It accuses everyone else of corruption.

That’s not theology.
That’s reverse engineering.


🔥 The Desperation Shows

Rather than provide:

  • A named prophet between Jesus and Muhammad,

  • A continuous line of preserved revelation,

  • Evidence of pre-Islamic “Muslim” communities…

Islam resorts to:

  • Calling Jesus a Muslim, without evidence,

  • Calling the Bible corrupted, without proof,

  • Claiming a lost Injil, that no one has ever seen.

It’s not revelation.
It’s a patch job.


💬 Mic-Drop Closer

“Instead of explaining the silence…
Islam rewrote Jesus to make the silence look divine.

But Jesus didn’t preach Islam —
And Islam didn’t inherit the truth —
It hijacked a prophet it didn’t understand…
To cover a gap it couldn’t fill.

No comments:

Post a Comment

  What Did Muhammad's Islam Look Like Without Hadiths, Sharia, or Later Developments? If we strip away the Hadiths, Sharia law, tafsir (...