🛏️ Muhammad Allowed and Practiced Temporary Marriage (Mut'ah)

Islam’s Sanction of Legalized Prostitution

---

📜 The Hadith Evidence

“We used to do Mut’ah during the lifetime of the Prophet and during the time of Abu Bakr.”
— Sahih Muslim 1405

This is not a fringe narration. It’s found in Sahih Muslim, one of Islam’s most authentic hadith collections.

The companions of Muhammad openly state that Mut’ah — temporary marriage for sex — was sanctioned and practiced during the life of the prophet and even under the first caliph, Abu Bakr.

---

🤔 What is Mut’ah?

Mut’ah is a form of “marriage” with a pre-agreed time limit, often as short as one night, and with payment in return — usually money or goods.

It is a contract that looks like this:

• Man: “I marry you for X time and X price.”

• Woman: “I accept.”
  — The “marriage” is legal for the agreed duration — then automatically ends.

This is not an eternal covenant. It is a religiously rubber-stamped one-night stand.

---

🧠 The Implications

Let’s be blunt:

Mut’ah = sanctified prostitution.

It’s sex for a price, under a thin legal veneer.

Even early Muslim scholars admitted this. Renowned Hanafi jurist Ibn Humam stated:

“Mut'ah is a marriage contracted for a limited time and with a known dower. It is essentially a form of hired intercourse.”

This was not an accident. It was authorized by Muhammad himself.

---

❗What This Says About Muhammad’s Character

1. He Permitted and Endorsed Sex-for-Hire

Rather than abolish pagan sexual practices, Muhammad legitimized them:

• Early Islam allowed Mut’ah for traveling men, soldiers, or anyone desiring sex.

• No requirement for long-term commitment.

• No lifelong responsibility or spiritual covenant — just sex, payment, expiration.

This violates every basic standard of morality taught in the Bible — or even by common human conscience.

---

2. He Only Forbade It Later, Conveniently

Some traditions claim that Muhammad later “abrogated” Mut’ah — others say Umar did.

But this raises serious issues:

• If it was wrong, why did a prophet of God permit it for years?

• If it was right, why did later caliphs forbid it?

• How can a moral law change based on convenience or political pressure?

This exposes Islam’s alleged “perfect moral system” as unstable, contradictory, and pragmatically driven — not divinely inspired.

---

3. Sunni vs. Shia Chaos Proves Islam’s Moral Confusion

• Sunnis claim Mut’ah was abrogated.

• Shia Muslims still practice it today, calling it a valid Islamic tradition.

So who is right?

Both claim the Qur’an supports their position. The Shia cite Surah 4:24, which allows “marriage with enjoyment.” Sunnis scramble to reinterpret it.

This split reveals a disturbing truth:

Islam can’t even agree on what counts as marriage vs. prostitution — and both claim Muhammad’s example.

---

📉 Moral Comparison: Muhammad vs. Christ

Jesus	Muhammad
Taught that lust is sin (Matthew 5:28)	Permitted temporary sex-for-pay
Elevated women as image-bearers of God	Treated women as disposable pleasure vessels
Promoted lifelong covenantal marriage	Allowed short-term sexual contracts
Died unmarried, sinless	Had multiple wives, concubines, and permitted sex-for-hire

The contrast could not be more striking.

---

🔥 Final Verdict: A Prophet Who Sanctioned Sin

If Muhammad allowed and practiced Mut’ah, then:

• He enabled exploitation of women,

• He endorsed transactional sex,

• And he failed to establish a consistent moral standard.

This is not prophetic behavior — it is opportunistic indulgence wrapped in religious language.

---

❗Christian Challenge to Muslims:

How can a prophet who permitted what even modern Muslims consider shameful be your moral example?

If Islam’s founder couldn’t tell the difference between marriage and prostitution, why should you trust his revelations?

This is not holiness. This is hedonism cloaked in theology.