π¨ No Compulsion in Religion?
The Abrogation Trap Inside the Qur’an
Islamic apologists love to quote:
“There is no compulsion in religion.” (Qur’an 2:256)
They claim it proves Islam is inherently tolerant. But there’s a fatal flaw: the doctrine of abrogation. And it exposes the entire Qur’an as a contradictory, incoherent text.
⚡ The Core Problem: Abrogation Cancels Itself
The Qur’an itself declares:
“We do not abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten, except that We bring forth one better than it or similar to it.” (Qur’an 2:106)
This idea — called naskh — says some verses cancel others. So, what’s the problem?
π If abrogation happened at all, the older, “abrogated” verses should be erased from the Qur’an.
π If no abrogation happened, why have generations of Islamic scholars (like Ibn Kathir, Al-Qurtubi, Al-Shafi’i) insisted it did?
Either way, the Qur’an looks like a legal contract full of obsolete clauses still printed as divine revelation. That’s not “eternal clarity” — it’s confusion.
π₯ The Contradictory “Peace” and “Violence” Commands
In its early Meccan period, the Qur’an says:
-
“No compulsion in religion.” (2:256)
-
“To you your religion, and to me mine.” (109:6)
But once Muhammad gained political power in Medina, the tone shifted:
-
“Kill the polytheists wherever you find them.” (9:5)
-
“Fight those who do not believe in Allah… until they pay the jizya and feel subdued.” (9:29)
Islamic scholars themselves admit: the peaceful verses were abrogated by the later militant ones. Ibn Kathir says 2:256 was overridden by 9:5. This is not a fringe view — it’s mainstream Sunni doctrine.
⚠️ The Logical Collapse
Here’s why it’s incoherent:
✅ If abrogation is real:
-
The Qur’an cancels itself.
-
It’s no longer a single, unified revelation — it’s a patchwork of temporary commands.
✅ If abrogation is false:
-
All the violent commands still apply — forever.
Either way, Islam’s claim to be a final, clear, eternal word of God falls apart.
π‘ The Final Incoherence: Unchanging Yet Changing?
Islam teaches the Qur’an is:
-
Uncreated, eternal
-
Perfect and final
Yet it also abrogates itself? How can an eternal word of God change? How can it cancel itself?
The answer is: it can’t. And the contradictions show that abrogation is not a divine principle — it’s a desperate attempt by later theologians to fix an inconsistent human book.
π₯ Conclusion: A House of Cards
The closer you look, the clearer it gets:
-
Islam’s “peaceful” verses were temporary.
-
Abrogation is a theological band-aid for internal contradictions.
-
The Qur’an’s so-called “eternal clarity” is just an illusion.
-
Like a house of cards, the whole system collapses under its own contradictions.
So next time someone quotes “no compulsion in religion” as proof of Islam’s tolerance, remember:
➡️ That verse was cancelled by later commands for war and subjugation.
➡️ It’s not a sign of tolerance — it’s a sign of a man-made patchwork trying to cover up its own cracks.
No comments:
Post a Comment