Thursday, June 12, 2025

🚨 No Compulsion in Religion? 

The Abrogation Trap Inside the Qur’an

Islamic apologists love to quote:

“There is no compulsion in religion.” (Qur’an 2:256)

They claim it proves Islam is inherently tolerant. But there’s a fatal flaw: the doctrine of abrogation. And it exposes the entire Qur’an as a contradictory, incoherent text.


⚡ The Core Problem: Abrogation Cancels Itself

The Qur’an itself declares:

“We do not abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten, except that We bring forth one better than it or similar to it.” (Qur’an 2:106)

This idea — called naskh — says some verses cancel others. So, what’s the problem?

πŸ‘‰ If abrogation happened at all, the older, “abrogated” verses should be erased from the Qur’an.
πŸ‘‰ If no abrogation happened, why have generations of Islamic scholars (like Ibn Kathir, Al-Qurtubi, Al-Shafi’i) insisted it did?

Either way, the Qur’an looks like a legal contract full of obsolete clauses still printed as divine revelation. That’s not “eternal clarity” — it’s confusion.


πŸŸ₯ The Contradictory “Peace” and “Violence” Commands

In its early Meccan period, the Qur’an says:

  • “No compulsion in religion.” (2:256)

  • “To you your religion, and to me mine.” (109:6)

But once Muhammad gained political power in Medina, the tone shifted:

  • “Kill the polytheists wherever you find them.” (9:5)

  • “Fight those who do not believe in Allah… until they pay the jizya and feel subdued.” (9:29)

Islamic scholars themselves admit: the peaceful verses were abrogated by the later militant ones. Ibn Kathir says 2:256 was overridden by 9:5. This is not a fringe view — it’s mainstream Sunni doctrine.


⚠️ The Logical Collapse

Here’s why it’s incoherent:

✅ If abrogation is real:

  • The Qur’an cancels itself.

  • It’s no longer a single, unified revelation — it’s a patchwork of temporary commands.

✅ If abrogation is false:

  • All the violent commands still apply — forever.

Either way, Islam’s claim to be a final, clear, eternal word of God falls apart.


πŸ’‘ The Final Incoherence: Unchanging Yet Changing?

Islam teaches the Qur’an is:

  • Uncreated, eternal

  • Perfect and final

Yet it also abrogates itself? How can an eternal word of God change? How can it cancel itself?

The answer is: it can’t. And the contradictions show that abrogation is not a divine principle — it’s a desperate attempt by later theologians to fix an inconsistent human book.


πŸ’₯ Conclusion: A House of Cards

The closer you look, the clearer it gets:

  • Islam’s “peaceful” verses were temporary.

  • Abrogation is a theological band-aid for internal contradictions.

  • The Qur’an’s so-called “eternal clarity” is just an illusion.

  • Like a house of cards, the whole system collapses under its own contradictions.

So next time someone quotes “no compulsion in religion” as proof of Islam’s tolerance, remember:
➡️ That verse was cancelled by later commands for war and subjugation.
➡️ It’s not a sign of tolerance — it’s a sign of a man-made patchwork trying to cover up its own cracks.

No comments:

Post a Comment

  What Did Muhammad's Islam Look Like Without Hadiths, Sharia, or Later Developments? If we strip away the Hadiths, Sharia law, tafsir (...