𧨠10 Dawah Responses to Destroy (Part 3)
When They Run Out of Evidence, They Run These Lines — And They All Collapse
π§ #1: “You’re just quoting from Islamophobic sources.”
❌ Why It Fails:
-
Most of the critiques come from Islamic sources: Bukhari, Muslim, Ibn Kathir, Tabari.
-
Are Aisha, Umar, or early scholars Islamophobic?
-
If a source is false, prove it wrong — don’t attack its label.
π Truth doesn’t care what label it’s wrapped in — only falsehood fears the source.
π§ #2: “Those were exceptional cases — not the norm.”
❌ Why It Fails:
-
That’s exactly the point — divine law shouldn’t need exceptions to be moral.
-
Are child marriage, slavery, and wife-beating exceptions — or part of the revealed law?
-
If your god gave exceptions for injustice, then he isn’t just.
π A moral system that tolerates evil "sometimes" isn’t from a holy God.
π§ #3: “Islam came gradually — not all laws were given at once.”
❌ Why It Fails:
-
Gradual reform might apply to humans — but God’s morality doesn’t evolve.
-
Eternal truths don’t come in stages — they’re true from the start.
-
Islam’s earliest verses allow evil, and the later ones codify it.
π Morality doesn’t require phases — compromise does.
π§ #4: “That’s just your interpretation.”
❌ Why It Fails:
-
These are literal verses, canonical hadiths, and mainstream tafsir.
-
It’s not my interpretation — it’s your sources saying what they say.
-
When you say “interpretation,” you really mean inconvenient truth.
π If your own books sound too damaging to believe — that’s not my fault.
π§ #5: “Islam is misunderstood — you need to talk to scholars.”
❌ Why It Fails:
-
Scholars don’t agree with each other.
-
Many Dawah preachers contradict classical scholarship when cornered.
-
If truth depends on scholars to decode it, then the Qur’an isn’t “clear” (mubin) or “easy to remember” (54:17).
π A divine message should be understood without a PhD.
π§ #6: “Don’t judge the religion by the followers.”
❌ Why It Fails:
-
We're judging the texts, not just the followers.
-
When the behavior aligns with scripture (violence, misogyny, intolerance), it’s not a misapplication — it’s obedience.
-
You can judge a tree by its fruit — that's why people leave.
π If people follow Islam and act unjustly, either the people are wrong — or the book is.
π§ #7: “You’re cherry-picking negative verses.”
❌ Why It Fails:
-
We’re quoting central teachings, not footnotes.
-
You can’t “balance out” violence with mercy — both can’t be equally divine.
-
You can't cherry-pick out of Allah's eternal word if it's all supposed to be perfect.
π If some verses embarrass you, it’s not cherry-picking — it’s spotlighting what you’re hiding.
π§ #8: “You need faith to understand.”
❌ Why It Fails:
-
That’s a cop-out, not a response.
-
Truth is true whether you believe it or not.
-
Requiring belief before investigation is blind submission, not critical thinking.
π If a belief system can’t be tested without already accepting it — it’s not truth, it’s a trap.
π§ #9: “That’s not what true Islam teaches.”
❌ Why It Fails:
-
Who decides what “true Islam” is? Salafi? Sufi? Ahmadi? Shia?
-
Every sect claims the others are false — all use the same Qur’an.
-
If your religion is endlessly flexible, then it has no fixed meaning.
π If Islam has to be redefined every time it’s challenged — it isn’t divine, it’s political.
π§ #10: “You’ll understand one day — when it’s too late.”
❌ Why It Fails:
-
That’s not an argument — it’s a threat cloaked as prophecy.
-
It admits there’s no evidence now — just punishment later.
-
If you can't prove it now, fear of hell won't make it true.
π “You’ll see after death” isn’t truth — it’s desperation.
π₯ Final Word
“When the facts run out, Dawah goes emotional.
When logic fails, Dawah gets mystical.
When evidence is lacking, Dawah gets personal.But truth doesn't dodge. Truth doesn’t threaten.
Truth just stands — and Islam doesn’t.”
No comments:
Post a Comment