This Is Islam Uncovered

🚫 Islam Is Not From God: The Case Is Closed

🧭 Introduction

After exploring the core contradictions in the Qur’an, the fabricated corruption narrative, and the post-Qur’anic evolution of Islamic theology, one truth emerges with crystal clarity:

Islam is not from God.
Not the Qur’an.
Not the Hadith.
Not the doctrine of tahrif.
Nothing.

This is not a claim based on bias or belief — it is the logical conclusion drawn directly from Islam’s own sources, examined under the lens of reason, evidence, and the Qur’an’s internal test.

📜 The Qur’an’s Own Test

Surah 4:82 – “Do they not reflect upon the Qur’an? Had it been from other than Allah, they would have found many contradictions therein.”

We did reflect. And we found contradictions — not minor ones, but fatal ones.

🔥 Core Contradiction #1: The Qur’an Affirms Scriptures Islam Rejects

The Qur’an says:

The Torah, Injil, and Zabur were revealed by Allah (3:3, 4:163, 5:46).
These scriptures still existed and were valid in Muhammad’s day (5:47, 7:157).
Allah’s words cannot be changed (6:115, 10:64).
Jews and Christians should judge by their books (5:43, 5:47).

But Islamic theology says:

The Torah and Gospel are corrupted.
The Injil no longer exists.
The Qur’an was sent to replace them.

That’s not a small discrepancy. That’s a core contradiction between the Qur’an and Islam itself.

🔥 Core Contradiction #2: The “Lost Injil” Lie

The Qur’an calls the book Christians had in Muhammad’s time the Injil (5:47).
It commands them to judge by what is in it.
It says Muhammad is described in it (7:157).

If that Injil was fake, then:

Allah affirmed a forgery.
Allah commanded obedience to it.
Allah referred to it as His word.

That makes either:

Allah a deceiver, or
The Qur’an a mistake-ridden human document.

Either way, it’s not divine.

🔥 Core Contradiction #3: No Mention of Corruption

The Qur’an:

Never says the Torah, Injil, or Zabur were corrupted.
Never distinguishes between an “original” Injil and the Gospels Christians had.
Never claims these books were lost.

In fact, the only type of “tahrif” it mentions is misinterpretation, not textual alteration (see: Ibn Abbas, Al-Tabari).

The claim that the scriptures were corrupted is:

Not from the Qur’an
Not from Muhammad
But from later theologians like Ibn Hazm, who invented it to counter Christian arguments.

In short: the corruption claim is a man-made excuse, not a divine revelation.

🧠 Conclusion: The Logic Is Irrefutable

Let’s break it down formally.

❓ Can a perfect God contradict Himself?

No.

❓ Does the Qur’an contradict itself and Islamic doctrine?

Yes.

❓ Does the Qur’an affirm the Bible that Islam rejects?

Yes.

❓ Does that mean the Qur’an is not from God?

Yes.

✅ Final Verdict

If the Qur’an is wrong about the Torah and the Injil…
If it affirms what it later needs to deny…
If it contradicts its own claims about divine preservation…

Then it is not from Allah.

And if the Qur’an is not from Allah, then Islam is not from God.

Case closed.

🧱 The Foundation Is Broken

Islam is built on three claims:

The Book – The Qur’an
The Man – Muhammad
The Place – Mecca

You’ve already seen the book collapse under its own weight.

If the book is false, then:

The man is not a prophet.
The place is not sacred.
The religion is not divine.

💬 Shareable Closer

“A book that affirms corrupted scriptures is not divine.
A religion built on contradictions is not from God.
Islam is not from God — and the case is closed.”